 |
|
How and on whom to perform uterine-preserving surgery for uterine prolapse
Sumin Oh, Myung Jae Jeon
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022;65(4):317-324. Published online 2022 Jun 27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22003
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Woo Yeon Hwang, Myung Jae Jeon, Dong Hoon Suh
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef Nationwide assessment of practice variability in the utilization of hysteropexy at laparoscopic apical suspension for uterine prolapse
Kaily R. Cox, Tanaz R. Ferzandi, Christina E. Dancz, Rachel S. Mandelbaum, Maximilian Klar, Jason D. Wright, Koji Matsuo
AJOG Global Reports.2024; 4(1): 100322. CrossRef Robotic sacrocolpopexy
Al-Otaibi Mozon, Ju Hee Kim, Sa Ra Lee
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2024; 67(2): 212. CrossRef Comparative characteristics of laparoscopic sacrovaginopexy and transvaginal sacrospinous fixation
O.A. Petrenko, N.A. Petrenko, K.R. Bakhtiyarov
Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa.2023; 23(3): 64. CrossRef Sacrocolpopexy after sub‐total hysterectomy vs. sacral hysteropexy for advanced urogenital prolapse: A propensity‐matched study
Martina Arcieri, Alessandro Morlacco, Francesco Montebelli, Mariangela Mancini, Matteo Soligo, Stefano Restaino, Lorenza Driul, Giuseppe Campagna, Giovanni Panico, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Scambia, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Giuseppe Vizzielli
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2023; 163(3): 847. CrossRef Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy
Sumin Oh, Jung-Ho Shin
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2023; 66(6): 509. CrossRef
|