 |
|
Single port access laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus of more than 500 g.
Geon Woo Lee, Jang Keu Kim, Chang Su Shin, Won Kyu Choi, Byung Hun Kang, Jung Bo Yang, Young Bok Koh, Ki Hwan Lee
Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(6):392-397. Published online 2012 Jun 16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/KJOG.2012.55.6.392
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar
Gökhan Demirayak, İsa Aykut Özdemir, Cihan Comba, Berna Aslan Çetin, Begüm Aydogan Mathyk, Mustafa Yıldız, Veli Mihmanlı, İbrahim Karaca, Mustafa Öztürk, Onur Güralp
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.2020; 40(2): 217. CrossRef A different technique in gasless laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy
Gökhan Demirayak
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.2017; 37(5): 622. CrossRef Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
Lilin Yang, Jie Gao, Lei Zeng, Zhiwei Weng, Songping Luo
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2016; 133(1): 9. CrossRef Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus
Jinhwa Lee, Sunghoon Kim, Eun Ji Nam, Sun Mi Hwang, Young Tae Kim, Sang Wun Kim
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2015; 58(3): 239. CrossRef
|