Robotic sacrocolpopexy
Al-Otaibi Mozon, Ju Hee Kim, Sa Ra Lee
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024;67(2):212-217.   Published online 2024 Jan 18     DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.23226
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
No Difference in Prolapse Recurrence Rates Between Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Long-Term Comparison
Ye Zhang, Xiaowei Jiang, Meng Mao, Jing Bai, Yanpeng Tian, Wenjie Sun, Ruixia Guo
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2025; 32(5): 447.     CrossRef
Synthetic Meshes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Narrative Review
Sami Lasri, Hend Alshamsi, Lysanne Campeau
Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal.2025; 6(1): 2.     CrossRef
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes between the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and da Vinci® Xi in Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Shinichi Togami, Nozomi Furuzono, Mika Mizuno, Hiroaki Kobayashi
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2025; 14(2): 132.     CrossRef
Relation between pelvic organ prolapse and menopausal hormone therapy: nationwide cohort study
Hee-Yeong Jung, Tae-Ran Kim, Gwan Hee Han, Jin-Sung Yuk
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2025; 68(3): 210.     CrossRef
The Safety of Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bagrat Grigoryan, George Kasyan, Roman Shapovalenko, Alexander Popov, Dmitry Pushkar
International Urogynecology Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse–A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis
Chloé Dehan, Sarah Marcelle, Michelle Nisolle, Carine Munaut, Laurent de Landsheere
International Urogynecology Journal.2024; 35(11): 2203.     CrossRef