|CrossRef Text and Data Mining|
|Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.|
|Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification|
|E Sun Paik, Yoo-Young Lee, Eun-Jung Lee, Chel Hun Choi, Tae-Joong Kim, Jeong-Won Lee, Duk-Soo Bae, Byoung-Gie Kim|
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58(2):124-134. Published online March 16, 2015
Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification
Abridged republication of FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum
The revised 2014 FIGO staging system for epithelial ovarian cancer: Is a subclassification into FIGO stage IVA and IVB justified?
Ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer staging: Rationale and explanation of new FIGO staging 2013
FIGO staging for carcinosarcoma: Can the revised staging system predict overall survival?
New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system
Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum
Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution
Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009
Revised FIGO Staging System