CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Oral Misoprostol Compared with Oral Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor at Term Pregnancy.
W S Kim, Y S Won, K H Bang, J R Lee, M H Im, B I Lee, W Y Lee
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 1998;41(9):2461-2465.   Published online January 1, 2001

Excel Download

Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2016;294(3):495-503   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Oral Misoprostol and Intracervical Dinoprostone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Comparison
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2001;46(3):203-204   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Clinical Round: Dinoprostone Compared With Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor at Term
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2009;54(5):405-411   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2005;88(3):242-248   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5

90: Oral misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;208(1):S53   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term
Journal of Perinatology. 2013;34(2):95-99   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
PLOS ONE. 2020;15(1):e0227245   Crossref logo
Link1

A comparison of two dosage regimens of oral misoprostol for labor induction at term
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2002;81(4):337-342   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21(1):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

95 Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction? A randomized controlled trial
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001;185(6):S108   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2