Korean J Obstet Gynecol Search

CLOSE


Korean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;49(6):1204-1211.
Published online June 1, 2006.
Fetal Loss Rate after Midtrimester Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancies.
Back Kyoung Seo, Jin Hoon Chung, Jae Hyug Yang, Joong Sik Shin, Moon Young Kim, Hyun Mee Ryu, Min Ji Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Young Yu, June Seek Choi, Min Hyoung Kim, Yeon Kyung Cho, Kyu Hong Choi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sabi0515@hanmail.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the fetal loss rate among dichorionic twin gestations undergoing genetic amniocentesis compared with singletons undergoing the procedure and untested twins. METHODS: From January 2002 through December 2004, total 132 pregnant women with dichorionic twin gestation with mid-trimester amniocentesis at Hospital were included in this study. In control group, 595 women with untested dichorionic twins during the same period and 402 women with singleton pregnancies with amniocentesis performed by the same physician at the same date of study group were selected. Excluded were fetuses with known structural anomalies, cases in which amniocentesis was done in only one fetus, and cases of which pregnancies were terminated due to fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Fetal loss was defined as the loss of both fetuses and subdivided into two categories: within 4 weeks after amniocentesis and before 28 gestational weeks. RESULTS: Up to 4 weeks after the procedure, one case (0.75%) in the tested twin group, two cases in post-procedure singleton group (0.49%, P=.729), and eight cases in the untested twin control group (1.34%, P=.581) were aborted spontaneously. Up to 28 gestational weeks, four fetal losses occurred in post-amniocentesis twins (3.03%), sixteen cases in untested twins (2.69%, P=.83), and two cases in the singleton pregnancies with amniocentesis (0.49%, P=.017). CONCLUSION: The risk of fetal loss in twin underwent mid-trimester amniocentesis appears to be higher than that of tested singletons in this study. However, there was no significant difference in the fetal loss rates between amniocentesis twin group and untested twin group.
Key Words: Amniocentesis, Fetal loss, Twin pregnancy


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article category

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
4th Floor, 36 Gangnam-daero 132-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06044, Korea.
Tel: +82-2-2266-7238    Fax: +82-2-3445-2440    E-mail: journal@ogscience.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next