Obstet Gynecol Sci Search


Obstet Gynecol Sci > Volume 64(1); 2021 > Article
Agarwal, Sharma, Mehndiratta, Mohta, Srivastava, and Anthonio: Role of repeat procalcitonin estimation at 48 hours for outcome in pregnancy associated sepsis: a prospective observational study



We assessed whether repeat procalcitonin (PCT) estimation has a role in detecting organ dysfunctions and mortality in pregnancy associated sepsis (PAS).


The study included 85 pregnant, post-abortal, and postpartum women with PAS, diagnosed using the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria. Median interquartile range PCT levels were documented at admission and 48 hours later. Statistical comparisons were performed between the groups with non-severe and severe (≥1 organ failure) PAS, and between the survivor and mortality groups. The relationship between PCT and the number of organ failures was also assessed.


Most of the subjects with PAS were young and in the postpartum period (mean age 26 years; postpartum 55%). Sixteen (19%) patients died due to PAS. Sixty-two patients (74%) had severe PAS at presentation. Bacteria were isolated on culture in 64% of the subjects. PCT levels at admission were higher in patients with severe PAS than in those who did not have severe PAS. At 48 hours, this difference was significant (P=0.014; severe PAS 2.23 ng/mL vs. non-severe PAS 0.20 ng/mL). Furthermore, the number of organ failures increased at 48 hours. The PCT levels were significantly higher in the mortality group than in the survivors’ group at admission (8.31 ng/mL vs. 1.72 ng/mL), and the difference increased further at 48 hours (9.54 ng/mL vs. 1.37 ng/mL).


Repeat PCT estimation at 48 hours could complement the clinical findings and enhance the prognostic value for PAS.


Procalcitonin (PCT) is a precursor of the hormone calcitonin. Being an acute-phase reactant, elevated PCT levels correlate strongly with inflammatory cytokines and the severity of bacterial infection [1,2]. The increase in PCT in response to viral and noninfectious inflammation is much less marked.
PCT levels rise early after an inflammatory challenge and peak at 6-14 hours [1]. The half-life of PCT is 25-30 hours [1]. Originally, PCT levels were measured for the diagnosis of bacterial vs. non-bacterial etiology of systemic inflammation. As experience with the marker increased, it has been used in a variety of clinical conditions [1,2]. The primary use has been for the confirmation, assessment of severity, and follow-up after initiation of therapy for sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. PCT levels correlate well with organ dysfunction and the risk of mortality in patients admitted to critical care for sepsis. Another important use of PCT is to monitor the duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with sepsis. PCT has been used in obstetrics for detecting asymptomatic bacteriuria, infection associated with the premature rupture of membranes, and hypertensive diseases [3-6]. More recently, PCT has been used to detect pregnancy associated sepsis (PAS), as well as to differentiate between the severe and nonsevere cases [7,8].
The challenges of maternal morbidity and mortality from PAS continue to remain high in both, low-income and developed nations [9]. The rate of PAS in developed countries ranges from to 4-10 per 10,000 live births. Although the exact data are not available, it is estimated that maternal mortality from PAS might be as high as 1% to 4.6% [9].
Sepsis is usually associated with a cascade involving cytokine and toxin release, low perfusion, anoxia, and tissue inflammation and damage. Involvement of various organs and their dysfunction unfortunately remains the leading cause of mortality following PAS. Determination of the risk of organ dysfunction and assessment of the severity of PAS is necessary to initiate interventions and for prognostication. A biochemical investigation to aid clinical judgments would be an asset for the management of PAS. We assessed whether a repeat 48-hour PCT level in addition to its level at admission has a role in detecting organ dysfunction and mortality in patients with PAS.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study was conducted between January 2019 and December 2019 (12 months). Clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee and prior consent was obtained from all patients. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

1. Inclusion criteria

All consecutive obstetric patients (pregnant, post-abortal [≥2 weeks] and postpartum [≤6 weeks]) with clinical signs of sepsis fulfilling the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria were enrolled as subjects with PAS.

2. Exclusion criteria

Subjects with a previously known history or diagnosed pathology of the pulmonary, cardiac, renal, hepatobiliary, and nervous system were excluded. Patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, premature rupture of the membranes, trauma, and burns were also excluded.

3. Methodology

For the purpose of this study, sepsis was defined as “life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection” [10,11].Severe sepsis was defined as an infection related to one or more organ dysfunctions within 24 hours of admission [12]. To evaluate a suspected case of sepsis, qSOFA criteria were used [10,11]. The presence of 2 or more parameters of the criteria is considered as a strong indicator of sepsis.
Eighty-five subjects with PAS were enrolled during this period. Sixteen subjects died; thus, the mortality rate was 18.82%. A detailed history and clinical examination were performed for all patients with PAS. PCT levels along with other laboratory parameters were investigated at admission and subsequently at 48 hours. Blood, high vaginal swab, urine, and pus (if present) samples were obtained and sent for bacterial culture and sensitivity. Requisite imaging was also performed. Key body systems (pulmonary, cardiac, renal, hepatobiliary, and neurological) were regularly assessed for signs of organ failure, and if detected, were managed accordingly.
Patients were classified into 2 groups based on organ failure: non-severe PAS, when there was no organ failure within 24 hours of admission and severe PAS when ≥1 organ failure occurred within 24 hours of admission [12]. Patients were further managed according to the hospital protocol and the individual patient’s condition. PCT quantitative analysis was performed using the human PCT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Biovendor Research and Diagnostic Products©, Brno, Czech Republic).

4. Statistical analysis

The statistical tests were performed using the online software ‘www.socscistatistics.com’. PCT levels were recorded as interquartile ranges (IQRs) along with median values. All descriptive parameters are expressed as percentages for qualitative parameters and as mean±standard deviation for quantitative parameters. The patients were stratified into different groups according to number of organ failures, and mortality. Intergroup and intragroup PCT levels were compared using non-parametric tests. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.


1. General

The average age of patients in our series was 26±4.6 years (range, 19-40 years). Of the 85 subjects with PAS, 47 (55%) were postpartum, 29 were antenatal (34%), and 9 were post-abortal (11%). The median (IQR) white blood cell count at admission was 19.5 (2.6-1.63)×109/L. A total of 54 subjects (63.52%) had a positive blood culture. Severe sepsis was present in 62 subjects (74%) (37 had one; 16 had 2, and 9 had ≥3 organ failures). There were 58 cases of respiratory failure, and 19 each of renal and hepatobiliary failures, indicating multiorgan failures. Among the 16 maternal mortalities, respiratory failure was recorded as the cause in all 16 deaths, renal failure in 8, and hepatobiliary failure in 10 (multiorgan in some). There were no mortalities during the initial 48-hour period in our series. Other patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.

2. Procalcitonin levels and organ failures

The median IQR PCT levels of the subjects at admission and at 48 hours were 2.87 ng/mL and 1.58 ng/mL, respectively (Table 2). Overall median IQR PCT values at admission were found to be higher in subjects with severe PAS with organ failure (3.99 ng/mL) than in those with non-severe PAS (1.05 ng/mL), although the difference did not reach significance levels (P=0.152). However, at 48 hours, the differences between the groups were more significant (P=0.014; severe PAS 2.23 ng/mL vs. non-severe PAS 0.20 ng/mL).
There was no significant improvement in PCT levels over a span of 48 hours in intragroup comparisons for both, non-severe and severe PAS groups, although a quantitative decrease in PCT values was seen in both groups.
On evaluation of the number of organ failures (Table 2), median IQR PCT values at 48 hours were significant indicators of organ failure (P=0.005). This was an important finding since the difference in PCT levels between the groups was not significant at admission (P=0.069). Comparison of PCT levels at admission and at 48 hours within the organ failure group was not significant (1 organ failure: P=0.896; 2 organ failures: P=0.535; 3 organ failures: P=0.477).

3. Procalcitonin levels and maternal mortality

The PCT levels at admission were significantly higher in the mortality group (8.31 ng/mL) vs. 1.72 ng/mL in the survival group (P=0.005) (Table 3). At 48 hours, PCT levels remained significantly higher in the mortality group (9.54 ng/mL) than in the survivors (1.37 ng/mL) (P=0.002). PCT levels at 48 hours showed a quantitative rise in the mortality group (9.54 ng/mL from 8.31 ng/mL) and a fall in the survivor group (1.37 ng/mL from 1.72 ng/mL); however, the changes in levels were not statistically significant. Hence, the effect of treatment was not discernable from this study.

4. Cutoff procalcitonin level for predicting maternal mortality

On receiver operating characteristic analysis, a PCT cutoff of >1.251 ng/mL at admission predicted mortality with a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 73.9% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.725) (Fig. 1). At 48 hours, the cutoff of PCT >0.0895 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 46.4% (AUC of 0.744) for predicting mortality.


Most subjects with PAS were young and in the postpartum period (mean age 26 years; postpartum 55%). A large number of patients presented with organ failure (74%) at the time of admission as they were late referrals. Bacteria were isolated in 64% patients, based on culture. Almost 19% patients with PAS died despite critical care.
The overall median IQR PCT values at admission were higher in patients with severe PAS than in those without severe PAS. At 48 hours, this difference was statistically significant. Further, higher the number of organ failures, higher were the PCT levels at 48 hours. This indicates that organ failure is associated with widespread systemic dysfunctions, and this might be responsible for the elevated PCT levels. The PCT levels, however, did not change significantly following the standard treatment in any of the groups, although it did fall quantitatively in most groups. As mentioned above, several patients in our series were brought in an advanced state of sepsis, which might be one of the other reasons for unaltered PCT within a span of 48 hours.
The PCT levels were significantly higher in the mortality group than in the survivors at admission (8.31 ng/mL vs. 1.72 ng/mL), and this difference increased further at 48 hours (9.54 ng/mL vs. 1.37 ng/mL). Thus, a non-declining PCT at 48 hours is a critical situation and requires urgent attention from the treating clinician.
The study found quantitative cut-off values of PCT at admission and at 48 hours (PCT cutoff >1.251 ng/mL and >0.0895 ng/mL, respectively) that were indicative of a risk to maternal life. This can be used in conjunction with clinical findings and other investigations for urgent interventions.
The repeat 48-hour PCT levels have been used in patients with trauma and burn injuries, as prognostic markers for the severity of sepsis and mortality [13,14]. Literature related to the use of PCT in obstetric sepsis is limited. Paccolat et al. [3] reported a PCT cutoff level of 0.25 ng/mL (specificity 91% on day 3 postpartum) to rule out infection during the perinatal period. This is similar to the threshold used to diagnose systemic infections and to guide the use of antibiotics in infected adult populations. Velasquez et al. [7] determined the usefulness of PCT in pregnancy-associated sepsis and for differentiating between bacterial and other causes of infection. Their study included 98 pregnant patients with suspected infection, and 45 with no infection. They found that median the IQR PCT was significantly higher in those with bacterial-related PAS compared to that in non-infected patients. They proposed a cutoff PCT value of 0.06 ng/mL (sensitivity 60%; specificity 84%) for the diagnosis of bacterial sepsis. They concluded that PCT can be useful in complementing the clinical findings for the diagnosis of sepsis in pregnancy, in a reliable and timely manner. Another study by Agarwal et al. [8] similarly found a significant difference between PCT levels in PAS cases and healthy controls. The study involved 40 cases and 40 controls. The mean PCT level in PAS cases was 2.46 ng/mL, while in controls it was 0.091 ng/mL. Additionally, mean PCT levels differed significantly between those with severe (3.12 ng/mL) and non-severe PAS (0.49 ng/mL) (P=0.04).
There are variations in PCT levels in obstetric studies related to PAS [3,8,9]. There are several physiological and hormonal changes during pregnancy that could also influence the decisive PCT levels for the diagnosis of sepsis. This might also be due to the different timings of sample collection and variations in the severity of sepsis in the studied populations. However, the rise in PCT levels in association with the severity of sepsis has been reported escribed in all the published studies. The current study further reiterates the finding that PCT levels are significantly different in severe PAS compared to those in non-severe PAS.
The high morbidity and mortality associated with PAS demands strengthening of health care at both, peripheral and tertiary levels. Many patients with severe sepsis follow a downhill course despite active organ support and critical care admission. Therefore, early recognition of sepsis in pregnant women is of paramount importance.
C-reactive protein is widely used in clinical practice as a nonspecific acute-phase indicator of inflammation. However, its use in PAS is limited. A wide range of C-reactive protein levels (40-200 mg/dL) are seen due to the physiological changes occurring during pregnancy; hence, they pose a diagnostic dilemma. Furthermore, the levels are increased in both, bacterial and non-bacterial inflammation [15,16].
Although the use of PCT for PAS is relatively new, favorable evidence is slowly emerging. A raised PCT level at admission and its persistence at 48 hours can be a warning sign of severe PAS. The levels are higher in cases with multiorgan failures. Thus, PCT can be useful for assessing the severity of systemic inflammation, the risk of organ dysfunction, and mortality in conjunction with clinical judgment.
PCT was originally developed for differentiating sepsis from a bacterial vs. non-bacterial etiology in adult patients. However, the indications gradually extended to guide and follow antibiotic management in sepsis, correlating with the severity of sepsis and as a biomarker of critical care admission. Currently, daily quantitative measurement of PCT is recommended in critically ill patients with a suspected diagnosis of systemic inflammation, to monitor the systemic inflammation and success of therapy [1,2]. This approach affects the therapeutic and diagnostic decisions, if PCT levels are interpreted along with other clinical data. The role of PCT in obstetric sepsis is far from established, in view of the limited literature on the subject.
Our study failed to find statistically significant changes in PCT levels over a span of 48 hours following standard treatment, which needs substantiation with further studies. Whether spacing the PCT testing at 72 hours or beyond could be useful to monitor the effects of the interventions remains to be seen in future studies. Determining the threshold values of PCT for the diagnosis of PAS remains a challenge.
Repeat sampling for PCT at 48 hours to determine the diagnosis for maternal outcomes is a new initiative in PAS. PCT levels correlate with the severity of systemic inflammation. Therefore, standalone estimation of PCT at 48 hours can also be helpful as a prognostic tool for the patients’ condition. The number of subjects in our study provided statistical strength.
Our research was conducted in a referral tertiary care obstetric center. There were more sick patients at admission. Thus, the results of our study might not be applicable for other setups and patient groups. Our study did not include healthy controls. The findings of this study should be interpreted with the following background. PCT continues to be investigated in several observational and interventional studies. It has been demonstrated to have good performance characteristics for the identification of bacterial infection and sepsis [2,17-21]. However, the evidence on PCT guided antibiotic therapy is less forthcoming. A recent Cochrane review cited inadequate evidence for PCT based antibiotic decisions for patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock [22]. Further, the use of PCT for PAS is relatively new. In our study, the response to antibiotics and treatment was not monitored via PCT levels.
In conclusions, repeat PCT estimation at 48 hours could complement clinical findings and enhance its prognostic value for patients with PAS.


Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi (2018 Oct 26).

Patient consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic curve of procalcitonin levels at admission and at 48 hours to predict maternal mortality.
Table 1
Pregnancy associated sepsis (PAS) subject characteristics
Parameter Total PAS (n=85) Survivor group (n=69) Mortality group (n=16)
Age (yr) 26±4.6 26±0.6 26±4.8
Type of PAS
 Postpartum 47 (55.3) 40 (58.0) 7 (43.8)
 Antenatal 29 (34.1) 22 (31.9) 7 (43.8)
 Post-abortal 9 (10.6) 7 (10.1) 2 (12.5)
Culture positivitya)
 Wound 3 (3.5) 3 (4.3) 0 (0)
 Urine 8 (9.4) 7 (10.1) 1 (6.3)
 Blood 23 (27.1) 10 (14.5) 13 (81.3)
Genital (high vaginal swab) 29 (34.1) 25 (36.2) 4 (25.0)
No. of organ failures
 1 37 (43.5) 32 (46.4) 5 (31.3)
 2 16 (18.8) 12 (17.4) 4 (25.0)
 3 9 (10.6) 2 (2.9) 7 (43.8)

Numbers in bracket represent percentages.

a) Bacterial growth observed in more than one sample.

Table 2
Association of procalcitonin (PCT) levels with organ failures
PCT (ng/mL)a) Total (n=85) No organ failure (n=23) Organ failures present (n=62) P-valueb) 1 organ failure (n=37) 2 organ failures (n=16) 3 organ failures (n=9) P-valuec)
At admission 2.87 (2.93-0.06) 1.06 (1.10-0.04) 3.99 (4.08-0.09) 0.152 2.73 (2.78-0.05) 7.06 (7.34-0.28) 10.54 (11.42-0.88) 0.069
At 48 hours 1.58 (1.64-0.06) 0.20 (0.25-0.05) 2.23 (2.30-0.07) 0.014 1.57 (1.62-0.05) 8.17 (8.53-0.36) 7.97 (8.81-0.84) 0.005
P-valued) 0.726 0.522 0.944 0.896 0.535 0.477

Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

a) Procalcitonin levels can be expressed both as ng/mL or μ/L, both are equivalent;

b) Mann-Whitney U test between PCT levels of no organ and with organ failures;

c) Kruskal-Wallis test (no organ failure vs. number of organ failures);

d) Mann-Whitney U test between PCT levels at admission and 48 hours in each group.

Table 3
Association of procalcitonin (PCT) levels with maternal mortality
PCT (ng/mL) Mortality (n=16) Survival group(n=69) P-valuea)
At admission 8.31 (8.90-0.60) 1.72 (1.77-0.05) 0.005
At 48 hours 9.54 (10.24-0.70) 1.37 (1.43-0.05) 0.002
P-valueb) 0.535 0.772

Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

a) Mann-Whitney U test between PCT levels of mortality and survival group;

b) Mann-Whitney U test between PCT levels at admission and 48 hours in each group.


1. Meisner M. Current status of procalcitonin in the ICU. Neth J Crit Care 2013;17:4-12.

2. Wacker C, Prkno A, Brunkhorst FM, Schlattmann P. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:426-35.
crossref pmid
3. Paccolat C, Harbarth S, Courvoisier D, Irion O, de Tejada BM. Procalcitonin levels during pregnancy, delivery and postpartum. J Perinat Med 2011;39:679-83.
crossref pmid
4. Duckworth S, Griffin M, Seed PT, North R, Myers J, Mackillop L, et al. Diagnostic biomarkers in women with suspected preeclampsia in a prospective multicentre study. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:245-52.
5. Ducarme G, Desroys du Roure F, Le Thuaut A, Grange J, Vital M, Dimet J. Efficacy of serum procalcitonin to predict spontaneous preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labour: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:65.
6. Bilir F, Akdemir N, Ozden S, Cevrioglu AS, Bilir C. Increased serum procalcitonin levels in pregnant patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2013;12:25.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Velasquez J, Zuleta J, Portilla P, Caicedo K, Portilla L, Patiño J. Usefulness of measuring procalcitonin (PTC) in pregnancy for the initial diagnosis of bacterial infection with systemic features. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:S514-5.
8. Agarwal R, Priyadarshini P, Mehndiratta M. Serum procalcitonin in pregnancy-associated sepsis: a case control study. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;25:15-9.
9. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Plante LA, Pacheco LD, Louis JM. SMFM Consult Series #47: Sepsis during pregnancy and the puerperium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:B2-10.
10. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1250-6.
11. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:304-77.
crossref pmid
12. Oud L. Pregnancy-associated severe sepsis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016;28:73-8.
crossref pmid
13. AlRawahi AN, AlHinai FA, Doig CJ, Ball CG, Dixon E, Xiao Z, et al. The prognostic value of serum procalcitonin measurements in critically injured patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 2019;23:390.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Cabral L, Afreixo V, Almeida L, Paiva JA. The use of procalcitonin (PCT) for diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0168475.
crossref pmid pmc
15. González-Fernández D, Pons ED, Rueda D, Sinisterra OT, Murillo E, Scott ME, et al. C-reactive protein is differentially modulated by co-existing infections, vitamin deficiencies and maternal factors in pregnant and lactating indigenous Panamanian women. Infect Dis Poverty 2017;6:94.
pmid pmc
16. Azizia MM, Irvine LM, Coker M, Sanusi FA. The role of C-reactive protein in modern obstetric and gynecological practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:394-401.
17. Hattori T, Nishiyama H, Kato H, Ikegami S, Nagayama M, Asami S, et al. Clinical value of procalcitonin for patients with suspected bloodstream infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2014;141:43-51.
crossref pmid
18. Laukemann S, Kasper N, Kulkarni P, Steiner D, Rast AC, Kutz A, et al. Can we reduce negative blood cultures with clinical scores and blood markers? Results from an observational cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e2264.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Trásy D, Tánczos K, Németh M, Hankovszky P, Lovas A, Mikor A, et al. Delta procalcitonin is a better indicator of infection than absolute procalcitonin values in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. J Immunol Res 2016 2016:3530752.

20. Sharma P, Patel K, Baria K, Lakhia K, Malhotra A, Shah K, et al. Procalcitonin level for prediction of postoperative infection in cardiac surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2016;24:344-9.
crossref pmid
21. Jhan JY, Huang YT, Shih CH, Yang JD, Lin YT, Lin SJ, et al. Procalcitonin levels to predict bacterial infection in surgical intensive care unit patients. Formos J Surg 2017;50:135-41.

22. Andriolo BN, Andriolo RB, Salomão R, Atallah ÁN. Effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin evaluation for reducing mortality in adults with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;1:CD010959.
crossref pmid

Article category

Browse all articles >


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
4th Floor, 36 Gangnam-daero 132-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06044, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3445-2382    Fax: +82-2-3445-2440    E-mail: journal@ogscience.org                

Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next